Rationale and Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the clinicopathologic significance of high-intensity areas in the ureter, urethra, prostate, and bone incidentally found on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the staging of bladder cancer.
Materials and Methods
Axial and sagittal DWI and T2-weighted imaging of the pelvis were evaluated in 157 patients with bladder cancer. Two observers assessed T2-weighted imaging with DWI independently. The observers pointed out 67 areas showing abnormal high signal intensity on DWI in the ureter ( n = 17), urethra ( n = 8), prostate ( n = 20), and bone ( n = 22). Of the 67 high-intensity areas, 33 lesions were confirmed histopathologically (ureter, n = 10; urethra, n = 7; prostate, n = 16), and 22 bone lesions were diagnosed using T1-weighted imaging and follow-up computed tomography. Thus, 55 lesions were evaluable for correlation with DWI findings.
Results
Of the 55 high-intensity areas, 28 (53%) were synchronous or metastatic urothelial cancer or invasion of urothelial cancer. The remaining 27 (47%) were a ureteral clot in one, a ureteral stone granuloma in one, prostatic cancer in six, granulomatous prostatitis in three, and normal red bone marrow in 16.
Conclusions
DWI is useful to comprehend the extent of bladder cancer and to detect incidentally coexisting diseases. Other imaging, endoscopic, and clinical findings would be useful to reduce false positivity.
In recent years, the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to detect various cancers, including those of the liver, breast, prostate, uterus, colorectum, and bone, has been reported . The usefulness of DWI to detect bladder cancer and determine the tumor stage has also been reported; the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of bladder cancer is low, and cancer shows high signal intensity (SI) on DWI . When interpreting pelvic DWI to determine the tumor stage of bladder cancer, abnormal high intensity is often found outside the bladder (eg, in the prostate, ureter, urethra, and bone). DWI high intensity may represent invasion or metastasis of bladder cancer, but it has not yet been clarified whether other malignant or nonmalignant lesions can also show such high intensity. Because the strategy for treating bladder cancer changes with the tumor site, extent, and stage, clarifying the clinical significance of such high-intensity areas would be very important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic significance of high-intensity areas in the prostate, ureter, urethra, or bone incidentally found on pelvic DWI performed for the purpose of staging bladder cancer.
Materials and methods
Patient Population
The subjects of this study were 157 patients with bladder cancer undergoing pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the tumor stage and repeat computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis to evaluate the node and metastasis stages between August 2006 and September 2009. All pelvic MRI studies included T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI. All patients underwent pelvic CT both at initial diagnosis and 3 to 9 months later. There were 118 men and 39 women aged 38 to 91 years (mean age, 71 years). Two abdominal radiologists reviewed 157 MRI studies and identified 67 areas that showed abnormally high SI in the ureter, urethra, prostate, or bone on DWI in 56 patients, on the basis of criteria described later. Of the patients, 29 underwent surgical intervention for areas showing high SI on DWI, including one-sided nephroureterectomy in nine, cystoprostatectomy in nine, prostatic biopsy in eight, ureteral biopsy in one, and urethral biopsy in two. From these surgical specimens, 33 high-intensity areas on DWI were histopathologically evaluable. One radiologist interpreted T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and both computed tomographic images to diagnose 22 bony lesions on the basis of criteria described later. Finally, 55 areas in 45 patients (36 men, nine women; age range, 38–91 years; mean age, 71 years) were evaluable for correlation with DWI findings. The local institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and the requirement for patient informed consent was waived.
MRI Protocol
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
DWI Interpretation
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Diagnostic Criteria
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Results
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Table 1
Summary of the Lesions Showing High Signal Intensity on DWI
Location DWI Positive Confirmed True-positive False-positive Ureter 17 10 8 2 Urethra 8 7 7 0 Prostate 20 16 7 9 Bone 22 22 6 16 All 67 55 28 27
DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging.
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Ureter
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Urethra
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Prostate
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Bone
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Discussion
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Conclusions
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
References
1. Nishie A., Tajima T., Ishigami K., et. al.: Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: pp. 373-382.
2. Yabuuchi H., Matsuo Y., Sunami S., et. al.: Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: pp. 11-17.
3. Tan C.H., Wang J., Kundra V.: Diffusion weighted imaging in prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: pp. 593-603.
4. Inada Y., Matsuki M., Nakai G., et. al.: Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging?. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: pp. 122-127.
5. Shinya S., Sasaki T., Nakagawa Y., et. al.: The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2009; 56: pp. 128-132.
6. Takenaka D., Ohno Y., Matsumoto K., et. al.: Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: pp. 298-308.
7. Takeuchi M., Sasaki S., Ito M., et. al.: Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging—accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 2009; 251: pp. 112-121.
8. Matsuki M., Inada Y., Tatsugami F., et. al.: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: pp. 201-204.
9. Watanabe H., Kanematsu M., Kondo H., et. al.: Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: pp. 1361-1366.
10. Kim J.H., Kim J.K., Park B.W., et. al.: Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: pp. 1173-1179.
11. Goldman S.M., Fajardo A.A., Naraval R.C., et. al.: Metastatic transitional cell carcinoma from the bladder: radiographic manifestations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132: pp. 419-425.
12. Yoshida S., Koga F., Kawakami S., et. al.: Initial experience of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess therapeutic response to induction chemoradiotherapy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2010; 75: pp. 387-391.
13. Nishizawa S., Imai S., Okaneya T., et. al.: Diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial tumors. Int Braz J Urol 2010; 36: pp. 18-28.
14. Takeuchi M., Matsuzaki K., Kubo H., et. al.: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of urinary epithelial cancer with upper urinary tract obstruction: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: pp. 1195-1199.
15. Silvera S., Oppenheim C., Touze E., et. al.: Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma on diffusion-weighted images: influence of T2-shine-through and T2-blackout effects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: pp. 236-241.
16. Vikram R., Sandler C.M., Ng C.S.: Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: part 1, lower urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: pp. 1481-1487.
17. Van Poppel H., Sorgeloose T.: Radical cystectomy with or without urethrectomy?. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 47: pp. 141-145.
18. Lim H.K., Kim J.K., Kim K.A., et. al.: Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection—a multireader study. Radiology 2009; 250: pp. 145-151.
19. Lamm D.L., Stogdill V.D., Stogdill B.J., et. al.: Complications of bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy in 1,278 patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 1986; 135: pp. 272-274.
20. Lim J., Yu J.S., Hong S.W., et. al.: A case of mass-forming splenic tuberculosis: MRI findings with emphasis of diffusion-weighted imaging characteristics. J Korean Med Sci 2011; 26: pp. 457-460.
21. Knap M.M., Lundbeck F., Overgaard J.: Prognostic factors, pattern of recurrence and survival in a Danish bladder cancer cohort treated with radical cystectomy. Acta Oncol 2003; 42: pp. 160-168.
22. del Regato J.A.: Pathways of metastatic spread of malignant tumors. Semin Oncol 1977; 4: pp. 33-38.
23. Nakanishi K., Kobayashi M., Nakaguchi K., et. al.: Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6: pp. 147-155.
24. Yasumoto M., Nonomura Y., Yoshimura R., et. al.: MR detection of iliac bone marrow involvement by malignant lymphoma with various MR sequences including diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31: pp. 263-269.
25. Tsushima Y., Takahashi-Taketomi A., Endo K.: Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: pp. 249-255.
26. Vandecaveye V., De Keyzer F., Vander Poorten V., et. al.: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009; 251: pp. 134-146.
27. Ren J., Huan Y., Wang H., et. al.: Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33: pp. 724-728.
28. Miller F.H., Hammond N., Siddiqi A.J., et. al.: Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: pp. 138-147.
29. Srinivasan A., Dvorak R., Perni K., et. al.: Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: pp. 40-44.