Home Educating Radiologists About Pain
Post
Cancel

Educating Radiologists About Pain

It is vital that radiologists understand pain. After all, it is the most common symptom that leads patients to seek medical care, and represents one of the most common indications for diagnostic and interventional radiological procedures . In addition, radiological procedures can be a source of pain to patients, particularly in the context of interventional procedures . By gaining a better understanding of the nature, assessment, and effective management of pain, radiologists and radiology personnel can do a better job of caring for patients.

Nature of Pain

Pain is an unpleasant subjective sensation, although its precise definition remains elusive. It can be caused by a variety of noxious stimuli, such as mechanical trauma, temperature extremes, and a variety of chemicals. These types of pain are usually associated with the activation of nociceptors (pain receptors) in the peripheral nervous system. Depending on the type of nociceptor involved, pain may be experienced as sharp and focal, as in the puncture of a fingertip, or dull and diffuse, as in the stretching or inflammation of the bowel .

Other types of pain are more difficult to understand. In some cases, pain may also be traced to a disorder of the nervous system itself, such as the neuropathic pain associated with long-standing diabetes . “Phantom limb” pain, pain felt in a limb or part of the body that is no longer present, is experienced by the majority of amputees, at least for a time . Psychology plays a key role in the pain experience. In many cases of chest pain, headaches, and back pain, no anatomic or pathologic cause of pain can be identified .

During the 17th century, French philosopher Rene Descartes proposed that pain represents the transmission of a disturbance from injured tissue to the brain . Today the broad outlines of the pathways along which sensations that register as pain are transmitted are relatively well worked out. From the stimulation of a sensory receptor that can generate a pain “signal,” the impulse travels to the spinal cord, crosses in the anterior commissure, ascends via the spinothalamic tract through a nucleus in the thalamus, and then travels into fibers that terminate predominately in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, as well as in portions of the brainstem, limbic system, and other areas of the cerebral cortex .

Yet this account does not fully explain the nature of certain types of pain, such as many cases of low back pain, chronic pain, and phantom limb pain. To further explain the complexity of pain, additional theories have built on the theory proposed by Descartes. These include gate control theory, the descending pain modulatory system, and the neuromatrix theory. These more recent theories incorporate higher brain processes in understanding the pain experience .

Although pain is by definition aversive, the inability to feel pain poses a serious problem for those afflicted with it. Congenital insensitivity to pain is associated with a dramatically increased risk of injury to organs, including the eyes, tongue, and extremities, as well as a general reduction in life expectancy . Other forms of insensitivity to pain are acquired, such as long-standing diabetes and spinal cord injury, and these too are associated with an increased risk of injury .

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Assessment of Pain

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Management

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

References

  • 1. Tanabe P., Buschmann M.: A prospective study of ED pain management practices and the patient’s perspective. J Emerg Nurs 1999; 25: pp. 171-177.

  • 2. Zondervan R.L., Hahn P.F., Sadow C.A., et. al.: Body CT scanning in young adults: examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer. Radiology 2013; 267: pp. 460-469.

  • 3. Notcutt W., Gibbs G.: Inadequate pain management: myth, stigma and professional fear. Postgrad Med J 2010; 86: pp. 453-458.

  • 4. Zhou B., Wang J., Yan Z., et. al.: Liver cancer: effects, safety, and cost-effectiveness of controlled-release oxycodone for pain control after TACE. Radiology 2012; 262: pp. 1014-1021.

  • 5. Zhao J.B., Luo Z.L., Feng C., et. al.: Effects of the intermittent injection with super-low pressure on the postoperative pain control during the uterine artery embolization for uterine myoma. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: pp. 14303-14307.

  • 6. Ropper A.H., Samuels M.A., Klein J.P.: Pain.Adams and Victor’s principles of neurology.2014.The McGraw-Hill CompaniesNew York, NY: Chapter 8

  • 7. Jensen T.S., Gottrup H., Sindrup S.H., et. al.: The clinical picture of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 2001; 429: pp. 1-11.

  • 8. Flor H., Nikolajsen L., Staehelin Jensen T.: Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7: pp. 873-881.

  • 9. Eccleston C.: Role of psychology in pain management. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: pp. 144-152.

  • 10. Melzack R.: Pain: past, present and future. Can J Exp Psychol 1993; 47: pp. 615-629.

  • 11. Bourne S., Machado A.G., Nagel S.J.: Basic anatomy and physiology of pain pathways. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014; 25: pp. 629-638.

  • 12. Nagasako E.M., Oaklander A.L., Dworkin R.H.: Congenital insensitivity to pain: an update. Pain 2003; 101: pp. 213-219.

  • 13. Golshani A.E., Kamdar A.A., Spence S.C., et. al.: Congenital indifference to pain: an illustrated case report and literature review. J Radiol Case Rep 2014; 8: pp. 16-23.

  • 14. Phillips A., Mehl A.A.: Diabetes mellitus and the increased risk of foot injuries. J Wound Care 2015; 24: pp. 4-7.

  • 15. McKinley W.O., Jackson A.B., Cardenas D.D., et. al.: Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: pp. 1402-1410.

  • 16. Clayton H.A., Reschak G.L.C., Gaynor S.E., et. al.: A novel program to assess and manage pain. Medsurg Nurs 2000; 9: pp. 318.

  • 17. Jacobs D.O.: Acute appendicitis and peritonitis.Kasper D.Fauci A.Hauser S. et. al.Harrison’s principles of internal medicine.2015.McGraw-Hill EducationNew York, NY:

  • 18. Lorenz K.A., Sherbourne C.D., Shugarman L.R., et. al.: How reliable is pain as the fifth vital sign?. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22: pp. 291-298.

  • 19. Keck J.F., Gerkensmeyer J.E., Joyce B.A., et. al.: Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain. J Pediatr Nurs 1996; 11: pp. 368-374.

  • 20. Goldberg D.S.: Job and the stigmatization of chronic pain. Perspect Biol Med 2010; 53: pp. 425-438.

  • 21. Bendtsen P., Hensing G., Ebeling C., et. al.: What are the qualities of dilemmas experienced when prescribing opioids in general practice?. Pain 1999; 82: pp. 89-96.

  • 22. Fishbain D.A., Rosomoff H.L., Cutler R.B., et. al.: Secondary gain concept: a review of the scientific evidence. Clin J Pain 1995; 11: pp. 6-21.

  • 23. Melzack R.: The tragedy of needless pain. Sci Am 1990; 262: pp. 27-33.

  • 24. Portenoy R.K., Foley K.M.: Chronic use of opioid analgesics in non-malignant pain: report of 38 cases. Pain 1986; 25: pp. 171-186.

  • 25. Compton W.M., Boyle M., Wargo E.: Prescription opioid abuse: problems and responses. Prev Med 2015; 80: pp. 5-9.

  • 26. Paulozzi L.J., Weisler R.H., Patkar A.A.: A national epidemic of unintentional prescription opioid overdose deaths: how physicians can help control it. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72: pp. 589-592.

  • 27. Okie S.: A flood of opioids, a rising tide of deaths. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: pp. 1981-1985.

  • 28. Rabow M.W., Pantilat S.Z.: Palliative care & pain management.Papadakis M.A.McPhee S.J.Rabow M.W.Current medical diagnosis & treatment 2016.2016.McGraw-Hill EducationNew York, NY:

  • 29. van Tulder M.W., Touray T., Furlan A.D., et. al.: Muscle relaxants for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; CD004252

  • 30. Uman L.S., Chambers C.T., McGrath P.J., et. al.: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: an abbreviated Cochrane review. J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 33: pp. 842-854.

  • 31. Leventhal E.A., Leventhal H., Shacham S., et. al.: Active coping reduces reports of pain from childbirth. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57: pp. 365-371.

  • 32. Puhl A.A., Reinhart C.J., Rok E.R., et. al.: An examination of the observed placebo effect associated with the treatment of low back pain—a systematic review. Pain Res Manag 2011; 16: pp. 45-52.

  • 33. Price D.D., Finniss D.G., Benedetti F.: A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: pp. 565-590.

  • 34. Kendrick C., Sliwinski J., Yu Y., et. al.: Hypnosis for acute procedural pain: a critical review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2016; 64: pp. 75-115.

  • 35. Yuan J., Purepong N., Kerr D.P., et. al.: Effectiveness of acupuncture for low back pain: a systematic review. Spine 2008; 33: pp. E887-E900.

  • 36. Yinger O.S., Gooding L.F.: A systematic review of music-based interventions for procedural support. J Music Ther 2015; 52: pp. 1-77.

  • 37. Assendelft W.J., Morton S.C., Yu E.I., et. al.: Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: pp. 871-881.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.