Home Improved Detection of Parenchymal Cysticercal Lesions in Neurocysticercosis with T2*-weighted Angiography Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Post
Cancel

Improved Detection of Parenchymal Cysticercal Lesions in Neurocysticercosis with T2*-weighted Angiography Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Rationale and Objectives

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool for the diagnosis and management of various central nervous system infections. In the present study, we investigated the role of T2*-weighted angiography (SWAN) imaging in the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NCC) viz-a-viz conventional MRI.

Methods

Symptomatic ( n = 46) and asymptomatic ( n = 88) cases from a pig-farming community were imaged using both conventional and SWAN MRI between July 2009 and May 2011. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently reviewed all the images to characterize the lesions as well as detection of the scolex.

Results

A total of 250 lesions were detected in 70 individuals. On conventional MRI, the lesion and scolex visibility was 82.4% (206/250) and 60% (150/250), respectively, which increased to 96.8% and 81%, respectively, using SWAN imaging. On combining SWAN with conventional MRI, the scolex visibility increased to 85% (213/250) of the total 250 lesions detected. Overall, adding SWAN to conventional MRI increased the lesion detection and scolex visibility up to 18% (206 vs. 250) and 30% (150 vs. 213), respectively.

Conclusion

SWAN imaging when added to the conventional MRI protocol for population screening for NCC in endemic regions improves both lesion detection and definitive diagnosis of neurocysticercosis.

Introduction

Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a parasitic infection of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by the larvae of Taenia solium , commonly known as tapeworm. It is the most common cause of acquired epilepsy in the developing world including India . The diagnosis of NCC is masked by its polymorphic clinical presentation. A wide range of serological assays has been developed for the diagnosis of NCC such as detection of anticysticercal antibodies in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoblot with varying sensitivity and specificity . However these assays have been less than satisfactory giving high false positive and false negative reactions. An enzyme linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay using specific glycoprotein (GP) antigens was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, with reported sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100% . A study showed only 28% sensitivity in serum samples of patients with single cyst infection . Subsequent studies from other countries have shown variable results. In Ecuador, 86% of patients with active lesions, 67% with transitional lesions, and only 41% of patients with inactive lesions were positive by the EITB, thus having an overall sensitivity of only 53.6% . In a recently published report from South India, only 12 of 46 (26.1%) patients with computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of NCC were positive by EITB .

Neuroimaging modalities such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have greatly improved the accuracy of diagnosis of NCC. Although CT is considered a more sensitive tool for the detection of calcifications , MRI is better to resolve the differential diagnosis of NCC as it provides objective evidence on the number and topography of lesions, its stage of involution, and the degree of inflammatory reaction. It provides both morphological and functional information and is considered the best neuroimaging tool for the detection of degenerating and innocuous (viable) cysticercosis .

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Materials and methods

Study Subjects

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Neuroimaging

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Figure 1, A-17-year-old asymptomatic girl having a vesicular NCC in the right occipital region. The cyst appears hyperintense with hypointense scolex on T2-weighted (a) , and hypointense with hyperintense scolex on T1-weighted (b) and T2-weighted FLAIR (c) images. The lesion is not visible on SWAN image (d) and does not show any enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted image (e) . FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; NCC, neurocysticercosis; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Figure 2, A-34-year-old male, who presented with seizures, had a degenerative cyst in the left frontal region. The cyst appears hyperintense with hypointense scolex on T2-weighted image (a) . The lesion is ill-defined on T1-weighted (b) , and isointense with hypointense scolex on T2-weighted FLAIR images (c) . The lesion with hypointense scolex is also clearly visible on SWAN image (d) and shows rim enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted image (e) . There is a considerable perilesional edema as evident on all these images. FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Figure 3, A-27-year-old asymptomatic female having a calcified lesion in the left frontal region. The lesion is not visible on T2-weighted (a) , T1-weighted (b) , and postcontrast T1-weighted (c) images. The lesion appears as a small iso- to hypointense nodule with a hypointense scolex on SWAN image (d) . It shows both negative phase clearly demarking the scolex and the positive phase representing the calcified body of the cyst on filtered phase image generated from multiecho SWAN dataset (e) . The lesion appears as uniformly hyperdense nodule on CT (f) . CT, computed tomography; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Imaging Analysis and Quantification

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Serology

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Sample Size Estimation and Statistical Methods

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Results

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 1

Distribution of NCC Patients According to Number of Lesions Detected by Both Techniques

Cyst Distribution No. of Patients No. of Lesions No. of Lesions Detected by Statistical Significance Conventional SWAN Single cysts 38 38 32 34 2–10 cysts 30 168 132 166 >10 cysts 2 44 42 42 Total 70 250 206 242 Mean (±SD) ∗ 2.94 (±3.89) 3.46 (±4.25) <0.001

NCC, neurocysticercosis; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 2

Stagewise Distribution of a Total of 250 Lesions and Scolex as Detected on MRI

Imaging Vesicular Degenerating Calcified_n_ /Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex CI 51 38 22 15 133 97 206/150 SWAN 45 30 20 13 177 160 242/203 CIS 51 38 22 15 177 160 250/213

CI, conventional MRI; CIS, conventional imaging including SWAN imaging; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 3

A Total of 113 Lesions Were Seen in Asymptomatic Neurocysticercosis Patients

Imaging Vesicular Degenerating Calcified_n_ /Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex CI 28 21 8 6 58 37 94/64 SWAN 24 16 8 5 77 69 109/90 CIS 28 21 8 6 77 69 113/96

CI, conventional MRI; CIS, conventional imaging including SWAN imaging; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 4

A Total of 137 Lesions Were Seen in Symptomatic Neurocysticercosis Patients

Imaging Vesicular Degenerating Calcified_n_ /Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex_n_ Scolex CI 23 17 14 9 75 60 112/86 SWAN 21 14 12 8 100 91 133/113 CIS 23 17 14 9 100 91 137/117

CI, conventional MRI; CIS, conventional imaging including SWAN imaging; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SWAN, T2*-weighted angiography.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Serology

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Discussion

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

References

  • 1. Garcia H.H., Del Brutto O.H.: Taenia solium cysticercosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2000; 14: pp. 97-119.

  • 2. Garcia H.H., Gonzalez A.E., Evans C.A.W., et. al.: Taenia solium cysticercosis. Lancet 2003; 362: pp. 547-556.

  • 3. Del Brutto O.H., Rajshekhar V., White A.C., et. al.: Proposed diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis. Neurology 2001; 57: pp. 177-183.

  • 4. Tsang V.C., Brand J.A., Boyer A.E.: An enzyme-linked immunoelectro transfer blot assay and glycoprotein antigens for diagnosing human cysticercosis ( Taenia solium ). J Infect Dis 1989; 159: pp. 50-59.

  • 5. Wilson M., Bryan R.T., Fried J.A., et. al.: Clinical evaluation of the cysticercosis enzyme linked immunoelectrotransfer blot in patients with neurocysticercosis. J Infect Dis 1991; 164: pp. 1007-1009.

  • 6. Goodman K.A., Ballagh S.A., Carpio A.: Case-control study of seropositivity for cysticercosis in Cuenca, Ecuador. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 1999; 60: pp. 70-74.

  • 7. Rajshekhar V.M., Raghava V., Prabhakaran V., et. al.: Active epilepsy as an index of burden of neurocysticercosis in Vellore district, India. Neurology 2006; 67: pp. 2135-2139.

  • 8. Garcia H.H., Del Brutto O.H.: Imaging findings in neurocysticercosis. Acta Trop 2003; 87: pp. 71-78.

  • 9. Chang K.H., Lee J.H., Han M.H., et. al.: The role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12: pp. 509-512.

  • 10. Gupta R.K., Kumar R., Chawla S., et. al.: Demonstration of scolex within calcified cysticercus cyst: Its possible role in the pathogenesis of perilesional edema. Epilepsia 2002; 43: pp. 1502-1508.

  • 11. Chawla S., Gupta R.K., Kumar R., et. al.: Demonstration of scolex in calcified cysticercus lesion using gradient echo with or without corrected phase imaging and its clinical implications. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: pp. 826-834.

  • 12. Gupta R.K., Rao S.B., Jain R., et. al.: Differentiation of calcification from chronic hemorrhage with corrected gradient echo phase imaging. J Comp Assistant Tomogr 2001; 25: pp. 698-704.

  • 13. Tanenbaum L., Vu T.: Susceptibility enhanced imaging of brain vasculature with SWAN. Neuro Imaging SignaPULSE 2008; pp. 24-26.

  • 14. Haacke E.M., Mittal S., Wu Z., et. al.: Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: pp. 19-30.

  • 15. Roy B., Verma S., Awasthi R., et. al.: Correlation of phase values with CT Hounsfield and R2* values in calcified neurocysticercosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: pp. 1060-1064.

  • 16. Prasad K.N., Prasad A., Gupta R.K., et. al.: Prevalence and associated risk factors of Taenia solium taeniasis in a rural pig farming community of North India. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene 2007; 101: pp. 1241-1247.

  • 17. Prasad K.N., Prasad A., Gupta R.K., et. al.: Neurocysticercosis in patients with seizures from pig farming community of Lucknow District, North India. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene 2009; 103: pp. 144-150.

  • 18. Commission on Epidemiology and Prognosis. International League against Epilepsy. Guidelines for epidemiologic studies on epilepsy. Epilepsia 1993; 34: pp. 592-596.

  • 19. Prasad K.N., Verma A., Srivastava S., et. al.: An epidemiological study on asymptomatic neurocysticercosis in the pig farming community from northern India. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene 2011; 105: pp. 531-536.

  • 20. Richards E., Schantz P.M.: Laboratory diagnosis of cysticercosis. Clin Lab Med 1991; 11: pp. 1011-1028.

  • 21. Rajshekhar V., Oommen A.: Serological studies using ELISA and EITB in patients with solitary cysticercus granuloma and seizures. Neurol Infect Epidemiol 1997; 2: pp. 177-180.

  • 22. Sanchez A.L., Ljungstrom I., Medina M.T.: Diagnosis of human neurocysticercosis in endemic countries: a clinical study in Honduras. Parasitol Int 1999; 48: pp. 81-89.

  • 23. Biswas R., Parija S.C., Narayan S.K.: Dot ELISA for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 2004; 46: pp. 249-252.

  • 24. Dorny P., Brandt J., Zoli A., et. al.: Immunodiagnostic tools for human and porcine cysticercosis. Acta Trop 2003; 87: pp. 79-86.

  • 25. Garcia H.H., Herrera G., Gilman R.H., et. al.: Discrepancies between cerebral computed tomography and western blot in the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 1994; 51: pp. 851-855.

  • 26. Cheong J.H., Kim J.M., Kim C.H.: Neurocysticercosis involving the pituitary stalk: case report and literature review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48: pp. 91-93.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.