Rationale and Objectives
In this study, we compared a newly developed multibreath simultaneous alveolar oxygen tension and apparent diffusion coefficient ( P A O 2 -ADC) imaging sequence to a single-breath acquisition, with the aim of mitigating the compromising effects of intervoxel flow and slow-filling regions on single-breath measurements, especially in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects.
Materials and Methods
Both single-breath and multibreath simultaneous P A O 2 -ADC imaging schemes were performed on a total of 10 human subjects (five asymptomatic smokers and five COPD subjects). Estimated P A O 2 and ADC values derived from the different sequences were compared both globally and regionally. The distribution of voxels with nonphysiological values was also compared between the two schemes.
Results
The multibreath protocol decreased the ventilation defect volumes by an average of 12.9 ± 6.6%. The multibreath sequence generated nonphysiological P A O 2 values in 11.0 ± 8.5% fewer voxels than the single-breath sequence. Single-breath P A O 2 maps also showed more regions with gas-flow artifacts and general signal heterogeneity. On average, the standard deviation of the P A O 2 distribution was 16.5 ± 7.0% lower using multibreath P A O 2 -ADC imaging, suggesting a more homogeneous gas distribution. Both mean and standard deviation of the ADC increased significantly from single- to multibreath imaging ( p = 0.048 and p = 0.070, respectively), suggesting more emphysematous regions in the slow-filling lung.
Conclusion
Multibreath P A O 2 -ADC imaging provides superior accuracy and efficiency compared to previous imaging protocols. P A O 2 and ADC maps generated by multibreath imaging allowed for the qualification of various regions as emphysematous or obstructed, which single-breath P A O 2 maps can only identify as defects. The simultaneous P A O 2 and ADC measurements generated by the presented multibreath method were also more physiologically realistic, and allowed for more detailed analysis of the slow-filling regions characteristic of COPD subjects.
Introduction
Hyperpolarized (HP) gas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently emerged as a technique capable of safely detecting a variety of changes in the lungs such as air flow restriction, airspace enlargement, decreased tissue perfusion, alveolar membrane thickening, and air trapping ( ), thereby expanding upon the parameters available from conventional modalities like computed tomography and x-ray imaging, and enabling the accurate, regional evaluation of gas flow and uptake ( ).
Two parameters that HP gas MRI is uniquely capable of assessing are regional alveolar oxygen tension ( P A O 2 ), which reflects oxygen delivery to the parenchyma and uptake into the blood, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which describes the diffusion of gas within various regions of the lung. Because P A O 2 reflects the balance between gas replacement through ventilation and uptake into the blood, it is sensitive to early manifestations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), an inflammatory lung condition causing chronic obstruction of airflow. ADC, on the other hand, is primarily indicative of structural changes in alveolar size and connectivity that are expected later in disease progression ( ). Often acquired simultaneously and coregistered, P A O 2 and ADC can serve as important indicators of pathophysiological changes in the lungs ( ), and together provide a more comprehensive portrait of lung function and structure than is available with other methods—increasing sensitivity to early subclinical alterations and, thereby, diagnostic power ( ).
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Materials and Methods
Demographics
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Table 1
Demographics and a Subset of Clinical Test Results
Subject Demographics PFTs Age (Years) TLC (L) Height (in) Weight (lb) BMI (kg/m 2 ) FEV 1 (L) FEV 1 /FVC (%) RV/TLC (%) DL CO (mL/min/mmHg) Pred. FEV 1 (%) Pred. DL CO (%) Life Impact SGRQ Overall (%) AS 1 58 6.01 64.5 141.7 23.9 2.97 78 34 19.29 117 91 15.9 AS 2 64 5.95 70.5 167 23.6 2.88 71 32 19.75 93 88 6.51 AS 3 67 6.91 66.5 198 31.5 2.81 72 46 23.73 110 93 29 AS 4 62 6.55 71.5 176 23.9 3.01 77 36 33.46 80 127 10.39 AS 5 31 7.87 75 207 25.9 5.19 80 16 34.2 101 92 2.64 Mean ± SD 56.4 ± 13.03 6.66 ± 0.79 69.6 ± 3.72 177.9 ± 23.2 25.76 ± 2.98 3.37 ± 0.91 75.6 ± 3.50 32.8 ± 9.68 26.09 ± 6.51 100.2 ± 12.95 98.2 ± 14.50 12.89 ± 9.17 COPD 1 70 6.57 69 184 27.2 0.88 35 59 8.7 28 37 51.5 COPD 2 68 5.04 63.5 158.5 27.2 1.54 58 46 12.44 83 73 18.88 COPD 3 60 9.24 67 178 27.9 1.26 40 62 14.66 39 59 29.79 COPD 4 55 5.14 67 180 28.2 2.29 71 41 16.07 92 68 57.16 COPD 5 61 3.71 63 134 23.7 0.67 49 62 8.95 27 51 7.727 Mean ± SD 62.8 ± 6.14 5.94 ± 2.10 65.9 ± 2.56 166.9 ± 20.9 26.84 ± 1.81 1.33 ± 0.63 51.8 ± 16.6 54.0 ± 9.82 12.16 ± 3.31 53.8 ± 31.28 57.6 ± 14.28 33.01 ± 21.06 P (T ≤ t) 0.406 0.542 0.268 0.587 0.548 0.036 0.036 0.038 0.014 0.080 0.006 0.088
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Measurement of P A O 2
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
1T1=0.45(299T)0.42[O2] 1
T
1
=
0.45
(
299
T
)
0.42
[
O
2
]
where T 1 , the longitudinal relaxation time, T , body temperature, and [O 2 ], oxygen concentration, are measured in s, K, and Amagat, respectively. At body temperature, Equation 1 yields:
T1=EPAO2 T
1
=
E
P
A
O
2
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Mn=M0cosn*NPE(α)×exp[−PAO2*tn(k)ξ] M
n
=
M
0
co
s
n
*
N
P
E
(
α
)
×
exp
[
−
P
A
O
2
*
t
n
(
k
)
ξ
]
where M 0 is the initial magnetization level of 3 He, N PE is the number of phase-encode gradients for each imaged slice, and α represents the flip angle. t n ( k ) is the start time of the n th acquisition for the k th slice.
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
MA(j)=FV*MS+(1−FV).MA(j−1).exp(DA),MA(0)=0 M
A
(
j
)
=
FV
*
M
S
+
(
1
−
FV
)
.
M
A
(
j
−
1
)
.
exp
(
D
A
)
,
M
A
(
0
)
=
0
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Simultaneous Measurement of P A O 2 and ADC
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
ADC=1b0(logS0S1) ADC
=
1
b
0
(
log
S
0
S
1
)
in which S 0 / S 1 corresponds to the measured signal intensity without/with diffusion encoding. The parameter b 0 combines the strength and duration of the gradients, as is standard for liquid and gas diffusion measurements by MRI. Although the numerical value of ADC can vary with gradient duration even as b 0 is held constant, we utilize the commonly chosen standard diffusion pulse timing parameters with no interpulse delay ( ).
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Imaging Parameters
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Imaging Studies
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Gas Delivery Device/System
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
HP 3 He Production
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Data Analysis
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Homogeneity=∑i,jp(i,j)1+|i−j| Homogeneity
=
∑
i
,
j
p
(
i
,
j
)
1
+
|
i
−
j
|
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Statistical Analyses
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Results/Discussion
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Table 2
Imaging Markers
P A O 2 ADC Single-breath Multibreath Single-breath Multibreath Subject Global (Torr) Heterogeneity \* (Torr) <40 or >160 Nonphysiol. † Global (Torr) Heterogeneity \* (Torr) <40 or >160 Nonphysiol. † Global (cm 2 /s) Heterogeneity \* (cm 2 /s) Global (cm 2 /s) Heterogeneity \* (cm 2 /s) AS 1 116 43 61 69 35 52 0.356 0.118 0.391 0.097 AS 2 ‡ - - - - - - 0.315 0.106 0.317 0.124 AS 3 73 42 102 85 36 89 0.320 0.109 0.328 0.108 AS 4 101 35 48 74 34 48 0.263 0.072 0.272 0.070 AS 5 ‡ - - - - - - 0.204 0.099 0.205 0.111 Mean ± SD 97 ± 22 40 ± 4 70 ± 28 76 ± 8 35 ± 1 63 ± 23 0.292 ± 0.059 0.101 ± 0.017 0.303 ± 0.069 0.102 ± 0.02 COPD 1 106 49 117 73 36 103 0.547 0.143 0.598 0.157 COPD 2 105 42 69 86 34 44 0.396 0.109 0.414 0.119 COPD 3 114 39 33 90 33 33 0.328 0.107 0.329 0.124 COPD 4 85 38 50 76 30 32 0.396 0.111 0.402 0.135 COPD 5 145 48 101 106 42 92 0.269 0.072 0.264 0.119 Mean ± SD 111 ± 22 43 ± 5 67 ± 44 86 ± 13 35 ± 4 56 ± 41 0.387 ± 0.104 0.108 ± 0.025 0.401 ± 0.125 0.131 ± 0.016 P (T ≤ t) 0.416 0.367 0.877 0.225 0.384 0.916 0.122 0.609 0.1720.037
ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation.
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Table 3
Imaging Markers
Slow-Filling Voxels ADC_P_ A O 2 Subject VDV Decrease (%) Mean (Torr) SD (Torr) Mean (cm 2 /s) SD (cm 2 /s) AS 1 15.8 0.372 0.267 59.8 22.0 AS 2 5.7 0.323 0.054 - - AS 3 13.6 0.274 0.093 73.6 26.4 AS 4 11.2 0.296 0.083 66.4 19.2 AS 5 3.5 0.206 0.033 - - Mean ± SD 10 ± 6.2 0.314 ± 0.052 0.147 ± 0.103 66.6 ± 6.9 22.5 ± 3.6 COPD 1 24.7 0.610 0.237 88.0 30.8 COPD 2 8.2 0.426 0.163 59.7 29.2 COPD 3 14.5 0.337 0.076 109.6 28.6 COPD 4 10.3 0.419 0.047 86.1 21.5 Mean ± SD 15.7 ± 7 0.455 ± 0.14 0.12 ± 0.103 88.4 ± 18.6 27 ± 4.9p ( T ≤ t ) 0.180 0.144 0.922 0.060 0.144
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation; VDV, ventilation defect volume.
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Limitations
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Conclusion
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<
References
1. Galbán C.J., Han M.K., Boes J.L., et. al.: Computed tomography-based biomarker provides unique signature for diagnosis of COPD phenotypes and disease progression. Nat Med 2012; 18: pp. 1711-1715.
2. Thurlbeck W.M., Simon G.: Radiographic appearance of the chest in emphysema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 130: pp. 429-440.
3. Kumar S, Liney G, Rai R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in lung: a review of its potential for radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2016; 89. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846194/ . Accessed July 6, 2018.
4. Mathews J.D., Forsythe A.V., Brady Z., et. al.: Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013; 346: pp. f2360.
5. Inaba Y., Chida K., Kobayashi R., et. al.: A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016; 17: pp. 391-401.
6. Currie GP. ABC of COPD. 3rd ed Wiley-Blackwell, 2017 Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/ABC+of+COPD%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119212850 . Accessed February 28, 2018.
7. Punturieri A., Croxton T.L., Weinmann G.G., et. al.: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a view from the NHLBI. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: pp. 441-443.
8. Hamedani H., Kadlecek S.J., Ishii M., et. al.: Alterations of regional alveolar oxygen tension in asymptomatic current smokers: assessment with hyperpolarized (3)He MR imaging. Radiology 2015; 274: pp. 585-596.
9. Hamedani H., Kadlecek S., Xin Y., et. al.: A hybrid multibreath wash-in wash-out lung function quantification scheme in human subjects using hyperpolarized 3He MRI for simultaneous assessment of specific ventilation, alveolar oxygen tension, oxygen uptake, and air trapping. Magn Reson Med 2017; 78: pp. 611-624.
10. Hamedani H., Clapp J.T., Kadlecek S.J., et. al.: Regional fractional ventilation by using multibreath wash-in (3)He MR imaging. Radiology 2016; 279: pp. 917-924.
11. Marshall H., Deppe M.H., Parra-Robles J., et. al.: Direct visualisation of collateral ventilation in COPD with hyperpolarised gas MRI. Thorax 2012; 67: pp. 613-617.
12. Horn F.C., Rao M., Stewart N.J., et. al.: Multiple breath washout of hyperpolarized 129Xe and 3He in human lungs with three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 2017; 77: pp. 2288-2295.
13. Kruger S.J., Nagle S.K., Couch M.J., et. al.: Functional imaging of the lungs with gas agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 43: pp. 295-315.
14. Saam B, Happer W, Middleton H: Nuclear relaxation of 3He in the presence of O 2 . Phys Rev At Mol Opt Phys 1995; 52: pp. 862-865.
15. Cereda M., Xin Y., Hamedani H., et. al.: Mild loss of lung aeration augments stretch in healthy lung regions. J Appl Physiol 2016; 120: pp. 444-454.
16. Clapp J., Hamedani H., Kadlecek S., et. al.: Multibreath alveolar oxygen tension imaging. Magn Reson Med 2016; 76: pp. 1092-1101.
17. Emami K., Hamedani H., Han B., et. al.: Automatic respiratory gas delivery device for noninvasive administration of hyperpolarized gaseous contrast agents to consciously breathing subjects. Am Thorac Soc 2012; pp. A2045. http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2012.185.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2045 Accessed July 6, 2018
18. Effect of T1 relaxation on ventilation mapping using hyperpolarized 129 Xe multiple breath wash-out imaging. https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/30009427/effect-of-t-1-relaxation-on-ventilation-mapping-using-hyperpolarized-129-xe-multiple-breath-wash-out-imaging . Accessed July 20, 2018.
19. Hamedani H., Kadlecek S.J., Emami K., et. al.: A multislice single breath-hold scheme for imaging alveolar oxygen tension in humans. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: pp. 1332-1345.
20. Yu J., Rajaei S., Ishii M., et. al.: Measurement of pulmonary partial pressure of oxygen and oxygen depletion rate with hyperpolarized helium-3 MRI: a preliminary reproducibility study on pig model. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: pp. 702-712.
21. Fischer M.C., Spector Z.Z., Ishii M., et. al.: Single-acquisition sequence for the measurement of oxygen partial pressure by hyperpolarized gas MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: pp. 766-773.
22. Fischer M.C., Kadlecek S., Yu J., et. al.: Measurements of regional alveolar oxygen pressure using hyperpolarized 3 He MRI. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: pp. 1430-1439.
23. Reza A.M.: Realization of the contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for real-time image enhancement. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol 2004; 38: pp. 35-44.
24. Bricault I.: A fast morphology-based registration.1997.SpringerBerlin, Heidelbergpp. 417-426. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/BFb0029264 Accessed July 6, 2018
25. Kirby M., Pike D., Coxson H.O., et. al.: Hyperpolarized (3)He ventilation defects used to predict pulmonary exacerbations in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Radiology 2014; 273: pp. 887-896.
26. Badrul M., Akter K., Akter A.: Detection of brain cancer from MRI images using neural network. Int J Appl Inf Syst 2016; 10: pp. 6-11.
27. Somwanshi D.K., Goswami A.: Detection of abnormalities in MRI images using texture analysis. J Int Acad Phys Sci 2011; 15: http://www.iaps.org.in/journal/index.php/journaliaps/article/view/212 Accessed July 20, 2018
28. Fain S.B., Panth S.R., Evans M.D., et. al.: Early emphysematous changes in asymptomatic smokers: detection with 3He MR imaging. Radiology 2006; 239: pp. 875-883.
29. Sheikh K., Capaldi D.P.I., Hoover D.A., et. al.: Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prior to radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol Open 2015; 2: pp. 81-89.
30. Hart M.C., Orzalesi M.M., Cook C.D.: Relation between anatomic respiratory dead space and body size and lung volume. J Appl Physiol 1963; 18: pp. 519-522.
31. Hamedani H., Kadlecek S.J., Ishii M., et al. A variability study of regional alveolar oxygen tension measurement in humans using hyperpolarized 3 He MRI. Magn Reson Med. 70:1557–1566.
32. Goto T., Suwa K., Uezono S., et. al.: The blood-gas partition coefficient of xenon may be lower than generally accepted. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: pp. 255-256.
33. Group NETTR A randomized trial comparing lung-volume–reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030287 ; 2009. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa030287?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov . Accessed July 27, 2018.
34. Thomen R.P., Sheshadri A., Quirk J.D., et. al.: Regional ventilation changes in severe asthma after bronchial thermoplasty with 3 He MR imaging and CT. Radiology 2015; 274: pp. 250-259.
35. Han M.K., Kazerooni E.A., Lynch D.A., et. al.: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations in the COPD gene study: associated radiologic phenotypes. Radiology 2011; 261: pp. 274-282.