Home Professional Social Networking in Radiology Who Is There and What Are They Doing?
Post
Cancel

Professional Social Networking in Radiology Who Is There and What Are They Doing?

Rationale and Objectives

Although it is perceived that the use of social media professionally is increasing among radiologists, little is known about the habits and demographics of this subspecialty. This study aims to compare radiologists who use social networking for professional purposes to those who do not with regard to their characteristics, habits, and attitudes.

Materials and Methods

Radiologists were invited by e-mail and through posts on social networks to participate in a survey on the use of social media platforms. Questions included type of user, pattern of use, and benefits and barriers. Professional users and professional nonusers were compared.

Results

One hundred eighty-six radiologists responded. One hundred ten (59.1%) used social networking for professional purposes, 34 (18.2%) for personal-use only, and 42 (22.6%) denied using social media. LinkedIn was the most common platform among all professional users, and Twitter was the most commonly used platform among highly active professional users. Trainees comprised 52 out of 110 (47.3%) professional social networking users compared to 18 out of 76 (23.7%) nonusers ( P < 0.01). A subgroup analysis on Twitter use for professional purposes revealed a significant gender difference: 15 out of 66 (22.7%) professional Twitter users were female compared to 48 out of 120 (40.0%) non-Twitter users ( P < 0.05). The greatest barrier to professional social media use for nonusers was confidentiality.

Conclusion

Nearly 60% of radiologist respondents use social networking for professional purposes. Radiology is likely to see growth in the role of social networking in the coming years as nearly half of professional users are radiology trainees. Twitter use for professional purposes among radiologists was disproportionately male. It is important to be cognizant of gender imbalance and to improve visibility of female leaders on social networking.

Introduction

Social networking in healthcare is a growing phenomenon . Early users were patients interacting with other patients in the form of online forums and automated mailing lists, known as listservs. Later patients and healthcare professionals used dedicated platforms for online social interaction, such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Recently, physician-to-physician interaction on social networking is growing, with users finding benefits of obtaining education and news, following medical conferences, and sharing expertise, research, and opinions . The American Medical Association states that social networking can “support physicians’ personal expression, enable individual physicians to have a professional presence online, foster collegiality and camaraderie within the profession, provide opportunity to widely disseminate public health messages and other health communication” .

A 2011 survey of 4033 physicians by QuantiaMD found that physicians are highly engaged with social networks: 90% of physicians report personal use and 65% of physicians use social media for professional reasons . A later survey of Australian physicians by Brown et al. found that 74% used social media networks to some extent . None of these surveys queried use among specialties in medicine. There are no studies that describe the use of social networking among individual radiologists. Although professional social networking may offer advantages to all physicians, there are also specific reasons to understand the radiologists’ use of social networking.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Methods

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Study Group

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Survey

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 1

Survey Questions

Defining the user Do you use social media? Which of the following social media services do you use for networking with friends and family (personal account)? Which of the following social media services do you use for networking with colleagues or for educational reasons (professional account)? Which best describes your social media accounts? Pattern of use How long have you used social media in a professional capacity? How would you characterize your usage of social media services for professional purposes? How would you characterize the amount of time spent on social media services for professional purposes? Benefits How have you used or benefited from social media professionally? Barriers What are some barriers to using social media for professional purposes? Radiologist characteristics What is your gender? To which “generation” described below do you consider yourself to belong? Where are you in your radiology career? What is your radiology practice type? What is your radiology subspecialty by fellowship or practice?

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Analysis of Survey Results

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Results

Study Group

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 2

Comparison of Users and Nonusers of Social Networking for Professional Purposes

All Users of Social Media for Professional Purposes Nonusers of Social Media for Professional Purposes_P_ Value 186 110 76 Gender 0.3045 Male 123(66.1%) 76(69.1%) 47(61.8%) Female 63(33.9%) 34(30.9%) 29(38.2%) Practice type 0.5303 Academic 119(64.0%) 72(65.5%) 47(61.8%) Private 37(19.9%) 23(20.9%) 14(18.4%) Combined 30(16.1%) 15(13.6%) 15(19.7%) Generation 0.0034 “The Greatest Generation” 0 “The Silent Generation” 0 “Baby Boomers” 39(21.0%) 16(14.5%) 23(30.3%) “Generation X” 85(45.7%) 48(43.6%) 37(48.7%) “Millennials/Generation Y” 62(33.3%) 46(41.8%) 16(21.1%) Career position 0.0086 Resident or Fellow 70(37.6%) 52(47.3%) 18(23.7%) In practice for <8 years 39(21.0%) 17(15.5%) 22(29.0%) In practice for 8–15 years 23(12.4%) 12(10.9%) 11(14.5%) In practice for >15 years 54(29.0%) 29(26.4%) 25(33.0%) Social media networks used for professional purposes LinkedIn 74(67.3%) Twitter 66(60.0%) Doximity 44(40.0%) Benefits of professional social media activity News from professional organizations 86(78.2%) Communicate with colleagues 69(62.3%) Scientific meetings 65(59.1%) Education 63(57.3%) Barriers to professional social media activity Not enough time 99(53.2%) 57(51.8%) 42(55.3%) Concerns over confidentiality 78(41.9%) 32(27.0% 46(60.5%) Concerns over unprofessional stigma 56(30.1%) 25(21.0%) 31(40.1%) Unfamiliarity with technical aspects 43(23.1%) 15(12.6%) 28(36.8%) Social media activity Consume only 27(24.5%) Consume and rarely contribute 49(44.5%) Consume and frequently contribute 34(30.9%)

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Comparison of Users and Nonusers of Professional Social Networking

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Habits of Radiologists and Benefits of Using Social Networks for Professional Purposes

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Barriers to Using Social Networks for Professional Purposes

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Discussion

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Conclusion

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

References

  • 1. AMN Healthcare, Inc : 2013 survey of social media and mobile usage by healthcare professionals. AMN Healthcare, Inc.2013.

  • 2. Antheunis M.L., Tates K., Nieboer T.E.: Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: pp. 426-431.

  • 3. Hoang J.K., McCall J., Dixon A.F., et. al.: Using social media to share your radiology research: how effective is a blog post?. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: pp. 760-765.

  • 4. American Medical Association : Opinion 9.124 – professionalism in the use of social media. AMA Journal of Ethics 2015; 17: pp. 432-434. Available at http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2015/05/coet1-1505.html Accessed June 15, 2015

  • 5. Modahl M., Tompsett L., Moorhead T.: Doctors, patients and social media. QuantiaMD. Available at http://www.quantiamd.com/q-qcp/social_media.pdf Accessed June 15, 2015

  • 6. Brown J., Ryan C., Harris A.: How doctors view and use social media: a national survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: pp. e267.

  • 7. Pathiraja F., Little D.: Social media: the next frontier in radiology. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: pp. 585-587.

  • 8. Kotsenas A.: 7 reasons neuroradiologists should use Twitter. AJNR Blog; Available at http://www.ajnrblog.org/2015/03/27/7-reasons-neuroradiologists-should-use-twitter/ Accessed June 15, 2015

  • 9. Matthews G.: Why the evolution of radiology includes social media. WCG Common Sense; Available at http://blog.wcgworld.com/2013/09/why-the-evolution-of-radiology-includes-social-media-sthash.MlJ6IqEM.dpuf Accessed June 15, 2015

  • 10. Prabhu V., Rosenkrantz A.B.: Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: pp. W48-W51.

  • 11. Hawkins C.M., Duszak R., Rawson J.V.: Social media in radiology: early trends in twitter microblogging at radiology’s largest international meeting. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11: pp. 387-390.

  • 12. Hawkins C.M., Hillman B.J., Carlos R.C., et. al.: The impact of social media on readership of a peer-reviewed medical journal. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11: pp. 1038-1043.

  • 13. Naeger D.M., Webb E.M.: Social media for professional purposes: introduction to the JACR “how to” video guide. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10: pp. 736-737.

  • 14. Krishnaraj A.: The history of the RFS. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: pp. 382-383.

  • 15. Krishnaraj A., Weinreb J.C., Ellenbogen P.H., et. al.: Impact of generational differences on the future of radiology: Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACR Forum. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9: pp. 104-107.

  • 16. Landman M.P., Shelton J., Kauffmann R.M., et. al.: Guidelines for maintaining a professional compass in the era of social networking. J Surg Educ 2010; 67: pp. 381-386.

  • 17. Slanetz P.J., Kung J., Eisenberg R.L.: Teaching radiology in the millennial era. Acad Radiol 2013; 20: pp. 387-389.

  • 18. Ventola C.L.: Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T 2014; 39: pp. 491-520.

  • 19. Hoy M.G., Milne G.: Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. J Interact Advert 2010; 10: pp. 28-45.

  • 20. Jolly S., Griffith K.A., DeCastro R., et. al.: Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: pp. 344-353.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.