Home Technical Compliance to Standard Guidelines for Lumbar Puncture and Myelography
Post
Cancel

Technical Compliance to Standard Guidelines for Lumbar Puncture and Myelography

Rationale and Objectives

To assess technical compliance among neuroradiology attendings and fellows to standard guidelines for lumbar puncture and myelography to minimize procedural complications such as iatrogenic meningitis and spinal headache.

Materials and Methods

We surveyed academic neuroradiology attendings and fellows in the e-mail directory of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology. We queried use of face masks, use of noncutting needles, and dural puncture practices. All data were collected anonymously.

Results

A total of 110 survey responses were received: 75 from neuroradiology attendings and 34 from fellows, which represents a 14% response rate from a total of 239 fellows. Forty-seven out of 101 (47%) neuroradiologists do not always wear a face mask during myelograms, and 50 out of 105(48%) neuroradiologists do not always wear a face mask during lumbar punctures, placing patients at risk for iatrogenic meningitis. Ninety-six out of 106 neuroradiologists (91%) use the Quincke cutting needle by default, compared to only 17 out of 109 neuroradiologists (16%) who have ever used noncutting needles proven to reduce spinal headache. Duration of postprocedure bed rest does not influence incidence of spinal headache and may subject patients to unnecessary monitoring. Only 15 out of 109 (14%) neuroradiologists in our study do not prescribe bed rest. There was no statistically significant difference in practice between attendings and fellows.

Conclusions

Iatrogenic meningitis and spinal headache are preventable complications of dural puncture that neuroradiologists can minimize by conforming to procedural guidelines. Wearing face masks and using noncutting spinal needles will reduce patient morbidity and lower hospitalization costs associated with procedural complications.

Lumbar punctures and myelograms may lead to rare but potentially fatal complications such as bacterial meningitis attributable to noncompliance with face mask use among health care personnel (HCP) . Aerosolized oral commensals and skin bacteria from HCPs, such as Streptococcus , Staphylococcus , Enterococcus , and Actinobacter , have been implicated as causative organisms . To reduce the risk of bacterial meningitis, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommend that HCPs wear face masks when performing myelograms and lumbar punctures with injection . After the publication of these recommendations, there have been continued reports of bacterial meningitis outbreaks resulting from inadequate face mask use , calling into question the degree of compliance to the CDC recommendations.

The potentially grave risk of developing iatrogenic meningitis, as well as the excess morbidity associated with other procedural complications such as spinal headache, prompted our investigation into the current practices of neuroradiology fellows and attendings. We performed a survey on the use of face masks, the use of noncutting Sprotte and Whitacre spinal needles, and the length of postprocedure bed rest. A concerted effort to perform lumbar punctures and myelograms according to evidence-based medicine would help reduce the incidence of iatrogenic meningitis and spinal headache and decrease excess hospitalization costs associated with these complications.

Materials and methods

Literature Review of Procedural Guidelines

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Survey of Neuroradiologists

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 1

Survey of Neuroradiology Attendings and Fellows

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Cost Estimates of Procedural Complications

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Results

Standard Guidelines for Lumbar Punctures and Myelograms

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Survey Responses

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Table 2

Lumbar Puncture and Myelogram Practices among Neuroradiologists

Item Number of Attendings (%) Number of Fellows (%)P Value ∗ Number of LPs or myelograms over 6 months .799 0–20 29 (39) 10 (29) 21–40 19 (25) 9 (26) 41–60 11 (15) 10 (29) 61–80 5 (7) 3 (9) 81–100 5 (7) 1 (3) >100 6 (8) 1 (3) Use of face mask in lumbar puncture .098 Always 32 (43) 23 (68) At times 19 (25) 4 (12) Frequently 11 (15) 2 (6) Never 10 (13) 4 (12) No response 3 (4) 2 (6) Use of face mask in myelogram .262 Always 34 (45) 20 (59) At times 18 (24) 3 (9) Frequently 7 (9) 2 (6) Never 12 (16) 5 (15) No response 4 (5) 4 (12) Frequency of Quincke needle use .841 1–10 12 (16) 2 (6) 11–20 15 (20) 7 (21) >20 40 (53) 20 (59) Do not use 6 (8) 4 (12) No response 2 (3) 1 (3) Frequency of Whitacre needle use .416 1–10 6 (8) 1 (3) 11–20 0 (0) 0 (0) >20 1 (1) 0 (0) Do not use 43 (57) 18 (53) No response 25 (33) 15 (44) Frequency of Sprotte needle use .940 1–10 5 (7) 2 (6) 11–20 3 (4) 0 (0) >20 0 (0) 0 (0) Do not use 41 (55) 18 (53) No response 26 (35) 14 (41) Default needle size .703 18G 1 (1) 1 (3) 20G 24 (32) 8 (24) 21G 4 (5) 2 (6) 22G 42 (56) 23 (68) 23G 2 (3) 0 (0) 25G 2 (3) 0 (0) Postprocedure bed rest .385 None 11 (15) 4 (12) 1–3 hours 38 (51) 25 (74) 3–6 hours 21 (28) 4 (12) >6 hours 5 (7) 1 (3)

LP, Lumbar puncture.

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Cost Estimates of Procedural Complications

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Discussion

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Acknowledgments

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

Get Radiology Tree app to read full this article<

References

  • 1. Schneeberger P.M., Janssen M., Voss A.: Alpha-hemolytic streptococci: a major pathogen of iatrogenic meningitis following lumbar puncture. Case reports and a review of the literature. Infection 1996; 24: pp. 29-33.

  • 2. Chitnis A.S., Guh A.Y., Benowitz I., et. al.: Outbreak of bacterial meningitis among patients undergoing myelography at an outpatient radiology clinic. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9: pp. 185-190.

  • 3. Schlesinger J.J., Salit I.E., McCormack G.: Streptococcal meningitis after myelography. Arch Neurol 1982; 39: pp. 576-577.

  • 4. Veringa E., van Belkum A., Schellekens H.: Iatrogenic meningitis by Streptococcus salivarius following lumbar puncture. J Hosp Infect 1995; 29: pp. 316-318.

  • 5. Barnwell R., Ball V.: Iatrogenic bacterial meningitis: an unmasked threat. CJEM 2012; 14: pp. 259-262.

  • 6. Pandian J.D., Sarada C., Radhakrishnan V.V., et. al.: Iatrogenic meningitis after lumbar puncture—a preventable health hazard. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56: pp. 119-124.

  • 7. Baer E.T.: Post-dural puncture bacterial meningitis. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: pp. 381-393.

  • 8. 2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/isolation/Isolation2007.pdf . Accessed Oct 17, 2013.

  • 9. Safe injection practices to prevent transmission of infections to patients. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/IP07_standardPrecaution.html . Accessed Oct 17, 2013.

  • 10. Outcomes for ICD-9-CM principle diagnosis code 349.0 Lumbar Puncture Reaction. The National Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov . Accessed Oct 17, 2013.

  • 11. Evans R.W., Armon C., Frohman E.M., et. al.: Assessment: prevention of post-lumbar puncture headaches: report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000; 55: pp. 909-914.

  • 12. Armon C., Evans R.W., Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology: Addendum to assessment: prevention of post-lumbar puncture headaches: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2005; 65: pp. 510-512.

  • 13. Kuntz K.M., Kokmen E., Stevens J.C., et. al.: Post-lumbar puncture headaches: experience in 501 consecutive procedures. Neurology 1992; 42: pp. 1884-1887.

  • 14. Birnbach D.J., Kuroda M.M., Sternman D., et. al.: Use of atraumatic spinal needles among neurologists in the United States. Headache 2001; 41: pp. 385-390.

  • 15. Boonmak P., Boonmak S.: Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 20: pp. CD001791.

  • 16. Vilming S.T., Schrader H., Monstad I.: Post-lumbar-puncture headache: the significance of body posture. A controlled study of 300 patients. Cephalalgia 1988; 8: pp. 75-78.

  • 17. Abel A.S., Brace J.R., McKinney A.M., et. al.: Practice patterns and opening pressure measurements using fluoroscopically guided lumbar puncture. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: pp. 823-825.

  • 18. Strupp M., Schueler O., Straube A., et. al.: “Atraumatic” Sprotte needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture headaches. Neurology 2001; 57: pp. 2310-2312.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.